User Tools

Site Tools


annual_staff_review

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
annual_staff_review [2008/03/21 07:55] jtkorbannual_staff_review [2008/03/21 08:09] (current) jtkorb
Line 1: Line 1:
 ====== Annual Staff Review Process ====== ====== Annual Staff Review Process ======
  
-The CS Department is using a goal/objective-oriented annual review format this year (2008), rather than the evaluative style used in previous years.  The new process is explained on the form, available as an {{annual_staff_review.rtf?nocache|RTF}} file.+The CS Department is using a goal/objective-oriented annual review format this year (2008), rather than the evaluative style used in previous years.  The new process is explained on the form, available as an {{annual_staff_review.rtf?nocache|RTF}} file.  (Thanks to Bob Davis in Engineering Education for providing the basis for this new review process.)
  
 If you have a [[http://docs.google.com|Google Docs]] account and would prefer to edit your copy directly in Google Docs, let [[mailto:jtk@cs.purdue.edu|me]] know and I will share it with you.   If you have a [[http://docs.google.com|Google Docs]] account and would prefer to edit your copy directly in Google Docs, let [[mailto:jtk@cs.purdue.edu|me]] know and I will share it with you.  
  
 The old-style review form, updated for 2007-08, is also available (as both {{cs_yearly_evaluation_2007-08.doc?nocache|Word}} and {{cs_yearly_evaluation_2007-08.pdf?nocache|PDF}} files) for those situations where it is needed (a supervisor/staff member decision). The old-style review form, updated for 2007-08, is also available (as both {{cs_yearly_evaluation_2007-08.doc?nocache|Word}} and {{cs_yearly_evaluation_2007-08.pdf?nocache|PDF}} files) for those situations where it is needed (a supervisor/staff member decision).
annual_staff_review.txt · Last modified: 2008/03/21 08:09 by jtkorb